Questions · Copy trading
How to check a Polymarket trader's real record before copying them
Copy trading fails for a boring reason: people copy wallets whose profit is not what it appears to be. Three specific accounting illusions explain most of it, and all three are checkable from the public tape.
The three ways a wallet looks better than it is
1. Open positions counted as profit. A wallet “up $50k” on markets that haven’t resolved has realized nothing. Prices move; unresolved gains are marks, not money. An honest record counts realized P&L only over resolved markets and reports open positions separately with cost basis.
2. Negative-risk mint artifacts. Polymarket’s neg-risk adapter lets a wallet acquire outcome shares without a matching buy on the tape. Those shares later appear as sells with no corresponding purchase — and a naive calculation reads that as pure profit. Markets where sell volume far exceeds buy volume have to be flagged and excluded, or the number is fiction.
3. Hedgers wearing a trader’s clothes. A market maker trading both sides of the same market can post steady profits you cannot copy directionally — by the time you take one side, you are not running their strategy at all. The tell is the share of markets where the wallet traded both outcomes.
The three numbers to demand
The Wallet P&L Analyzer reconstructs any wallet’s record from the public tape and reports exactly these:
win_rate— over resolved markets only, with the resolved count beside it so you can judge the sampletwo_sided_share— the hedger tell. High means don’t copy, however good the P&L lookscoverage_capped— whether the public tape’s pagination limit cut the history short, plus the exact span the stats do cover
Plus mint_excluded_markets, so you can see how much was set aside as artifact
rather than counted as skill.
A vetting funnel that costs about $8
Run the Whale Trades Tracker over the last few days and rank wallets by net buy flow. Take the top 20 candidates and run each through the analyzer at $0.35 — about $7 — then keep only wallets with a resolved-market win rate above your bar, a low two-sided share, and complete coverage. The funnel costs less than a single bad copied trade, and because it runs on public data you can re-run it monthly instead of trusting a leaderboard screenshot.
Questions
Frequently asked
Why not just use the Polymarket leaderboard?
Public leaderboards do not publish their accounting method, so you cannot tell whether a number includes open positions, mint artifacts or hedging volume. The point of a reconstruction is that every rule is stated and every exclusion is reported.
What win rate is good?
It depends on entry prices — a wallet buying favorites at 0.85 needs a much higher win rate than one buying longshots at 0.15. That is why the report includes avg_entry_price next to win_rate; judge them together, never alone.
How many wallets should I vet?
Vet the whole shortlist, not just the top one. At $0.35 per wallet the cost is trivial next to the risk, and the useful output is often the rejections: most wallets that look brilliant on a leaderboard fail one of the three checks.
Can this analyze any wallet address?
Any Polymarket wallet. Extremely active wallets can exceed the public tape's pagination depth; when that happens the report sets coverage_capped and states the exact window covered rather than implying it saw everything.
Polymarket Wallet P&L Analyzer
Flat $0.35 per wallet analyzed — vetting a shortlist of 20 wallets costs $7.